Artificial intelligence is steadily integrating into the legal sector, offering potential efficiencies in areas such as document review, legal research, and predictive analytics for case outcomes. However, the deployment of AI in law frequently encounters skepticism, often highlighted by anecdotes of its errors — misinterpretations of legal clauses, citation of non-existent precedents, or flawed legal suggestions. These incidents are scrutinized and sometimes used to argue against AI’s suitability for the complexities of the legal field. Such criticisms possess a degree of validity. AI systems can and do make errors, occasionally significant ones. As with any emerging technology applied to intricate domains like law, imperfections are expected. However, the disproportionate focus on AI’s fallibility often obscures that human error is pervasive within the legal profession and